by José Antonio Cervantes Acosta | Jul 17, 2026 | Gestión de Riesgos Corporativos, Gobierno Corporativo & Compliance
Arrendó un helicóptero a una empresa con domicilio en México. En caso de controversia, las disputas se resolverían ante tribunales en Luisiana. Creyó que esto le daría más certeza y protección. No fue así. La arrendadora presentó una demanda en Estados Unidos (EEUU),...
by José Antonio Cervantes Acosta | Jul 15, 2026 | Corporate Governance & Compliance, Corporate Risk Managemen
A widely held assumption among companies with international operations is that agreeing to arbitration abroad “removes” the dispute from Mexican courts. A case recently decided by Mexico’s Supreme Court of Justice (the Court) shows that this assumption is incomplete...
by José Antonio Cervantes Acosta | Jul 9, 2026 | Gestión de Riesgos Corporativos, Gobierno Corporativo & Compliance
Una idea muy extendida entre empresas con operaciones internacionales es que pactar arbitraje en el extranjero “saca” el conflicto de los tribunales mexicanos. Un asunto resuelto recientemente por el Pleno de la Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación...
by José Antonio Cervantes Acosta | Jul 7, 2026 | Corporate Governance & Compliance, Corporate Risk Managemen
If you are a director of a Mexican company and still believe that your obligation is limited to delivering financial and corporate information at the general shareholders’ meeting, within statutory and bylaw deadlines, you should reconsider. The Mexican Supreme...
by José Antonio Cervantes Acosta | Jul 7, 2026 | Corporate Governance & Compliance, Corporate Risk Managemen
A bank granted a loan to another company, which signed promissory notes with interest rates freely set by the lender and secured by a mortgage guarantee. The bank assumed that, because the borrower was another company, the rate would not be challenged. The Mexican...
